Technically, Rajbhan Kushwaha claims on LinkedIn he’s still working as an SoC Verification Intern at Samsung R&D Institute Bangalore. But we’re guessing not for long, after the careless engineering apprentice seemingly spilled the beans on the full name of that next-gen Exynos processor likely to power certain region-specific Galaxy S8 variants.

We were of course just told to expect the initiator of an entirely new 9 family following months of 8895 gossip, though Exynos 9810 sounds like an even bigger deal and more meaningful upgrade over the 8890 inside the Galaxy S7 than we ever dared to dream of.

Then again, there’s no reason to anticipate different specs from the ones purportedly leaked a couple of months back. We’re talking frugal yet powerful 10nm architecture, custom M2 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.5GHz speeds combined with A53s at 1.7GHz, a 550MHz Mali-G71 MP20 GPU, UFS 2.1 and 4K screen resolution support.

Meanwhile, a revised Samsung Gear VR headset could debut alongside the GS8 phone duo next month, according to a separate source and rumor, carrying model number SM-R324 (incrementally up from SM-R323), with a “different front cover to hold Galaxy S8”, and a “single hand controller.”

The controller part may actually change the game a little, following in the footsteps and directly competing Google’s Daydream View, although we should wait and see exactly what we’re dealing with here.

You May Also Like

Pocketnow Daily: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra to be the SELFIE KING?!(video)

On today’s Pocketnow Daily, we talk about the possible 40MP selfie camera in the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, Huawei P40 Pro leaks and more

Possible codenames and processors of Google Pixel 4a devices have emerged

We have the possible codenames and processors that may arrive in the upcoming Google Pixel 4a series, and maybe more Pixel devices

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra to arrive with a 40MP selfie camera?

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra may get the largest sensor ever found in a selfie camera, and 10x zoom capabilities in the S20 and S20+ is questionable