Posts tagged with: Legal
  • by |

    "Nokia has filed further cases in the United States alleging that HTC products infringe additional Nokia patents" is the wording from a Nokia statement. The Finnish phone maker has filed another ITC complaint against the Taiwanese manufacturer, targeting the HTC One, among others. "We began actions against HTC in 2012 to end the unauthorised use of our proprietary innovations and technologies. Since then, despite the German courts confirming infringements of Nokia patents in HTC products, HTC has shown no intention to end its practices, instead it has tried to shift responsibility to its ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    The iPhone 5 is the apple of discord (pun intended) between several retailers, including Best Buy, Toys "R" Us, and Walmart. The retailers have addressed their dissatisfaction to attorneys general in several states across the US; they complained about Walmart's comparison ads which, according to the companies, contain inaccurate pricing, and, are misleading by claiming the lowest prices. According to Best Buy, the company has lost roughly $65,000 in one day, when said Walmart promotion ran for the first time. According to the report, Walmart has allegedly sold the iPhone 5 for $150 on ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    On the surface it all seems so absurd. Several days ago, various news outlets reported that LG Display (not to be confused with LG Electronics) asked for a ban on the manufacture and domestic sales of Samsung's Galaxy Note 10.1, the tablet we weren't too impressed with back in August, which we reviewed in September, and which has failed to set the market on fire in the intervening months. How did this mediocre product get under the skin of Samsung's home-soil competitor? By allegedly breaching patents involving the angles at which the screen can be viewed. The LG-Samsung beef goes way ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    The Samsung Galaxy S III mini, announced mid-October, was added last month by Apple to the list of devices for which the Cupertino-based company is seeking justice in the courtrooms for alleged patent infringements. Samsung defended itself saying that the S III mini is not available in the US and thus it shouldn't be included in the lawsuit. Samsung confirmed that the phone in case will not be offered on the American market; as a response, Apple has withdrawn the Galaxy S III mini from the list together with patent infringement claims agains the device. Despite Apple's lawyers being able ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    The latest court rulings might be disappointing for both Apple and Samsung in their legal battle but it appears that the South Korean manufacturer might be facing a multi-billion fine in the European Union. The reason for such a measure might be Samsung's trying to use SEPs (standard-essential-patents) for trying to ban Apple products. The SEPs in mentioned refer to 3G technology and the amount of the fine -- imposed by the European Commission -- could run as high as 10% from the company's worldwide turnover. Opposed to Apple, who tried to ban Samsung's products based on alleged ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    After Apple and HTC have signed a ten-year licensing agreement we have recently found out that Samsung wanted to know all the details of the settlement. The South Korean company wants to see whether Apple is fine with licensing its user experience patents and in case it was, a Samsung ban wouldn't be justified. Apple and HTC both agreed to show a version of the document with financials redacted but Judge Paul S. Grewal, despite being "more than a little skeptical" about Samsung's argument, has granted the request. Apple and HTC are now being forced to show the unredacted version, however, ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Last week HTC and Apple announced a ten-year-long licensing deal but the exact details of the settlement were not made public. Samsung, who is facing legal actions defending itself and fighting Apple back in courtrooms across the globe --and US specifically--  suddenly became interested in the specifics of the Apple-HTC agreement, for its own defense. The question at hand is whether all of Apple's patents were included in the deal (and thus, those used to fight Samsung) or just some. If all patents are licensed, including the one referring to "user experience", this could threaten ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    There was quite a lot of buzz surrounding the storage space (and the available space) on the 32GB Surface tablet. The specifications include 32GB of storage but, as Microsoft itself has pointed out, File Explorer is only reporting 16GB free and accessible to the user, the rest being taken up be pre-installed applications, OS itself as well as a recovery partition. Because of that Microsoft has been hit with a lawsuit for allegedly misleading customers. Los Angeles lawyer Andrew Sokolowski is taking Microsoft to court because he purchased a 32GB Surface tablet and he quickly ran out of the ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Back in September after HTC unveiled its two Windows Phone devices there was a rumor that Nokia might sue HTC for design patents. Reason for the rumored lawsuit aside, the general idea was that with such a small market share Microsoft should do something and step in between its OEMs. Just recently HTC has signed a licensing deal with Apple but it looks like the Taiwanese company is caught in legal battles again, this time exactly with Nokia, but not over design patents. There are five venues where this battle is ongoing and the Finnish phone maker is suing HTC for 32 patents, including ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    HTC and Apple had their fair share of legal battles and you'll probably remember the HTC One X ban saga (where the U.S. International Trade Commission sided with Apple on December 19, 2011, when it imposed a formal import ban for HTC devices starting April 19, 2012). According to a joint press release the two companies have reached a global settlement alongside a ten-year long licensing agreement. While the exact terms of the agreement haven't been made public they guarantee that the two companies will no longer fight each other in the courtrooms for the matters settled (aside from ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    You know the drill: another week, another overload of tech news for three geeky guys to talk about. On this exiciting episode of the Pocketnow Weekly, though, things are a little different: in addition to the usual news from the three big mobile platforms, Michael, Anton, and Joe discuss issues of major import for the industry in our broadcast's new preshow segment. Today's "Thought Thread" covers the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and its impact on smartphones and tablets, as well as a little invention called CommBadge that has the potential to bring voice interface back into the ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Following a ruling in the Apple versus Samsung case the UK court has found that Samsung products did not infringe on Apple's patents, as claimed by the Cupertino company, because, as the judge noted humorously, "they do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool." As an effect, Apple has to post, in its website and printed media, an acknowledgement that Samsung did not copy its products' design -- still subject to a possible Supreme Court appeal. The bottom part of Apple UK's website hosts a small link that ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    United States International Trade Commission Judge Thomas Pender ruled that Samsung was infringing on four Apple patents. These include a patent related to the front face of the iPhone as well as one co-invented by the late Steve Jobs referring to touch-screen technology. However, the judge's findings have to be reviewed by the Commission in its entirety but, if uphold, could result in banning South Korean-made products from the U.S. market. February 25, 2013 is the date at which the investigation is scheduled to end. Samsung recently lost one of the battles in the U.S. and had to pay, ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    While the jury was off yesterday the CEOs of Apple and Samsung had a planned settlement discussion. As with previous similar talks, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung Chief Executive Kwon Oh Hyun, this one, too, has failed and the company leaders have not managed to reach a common ground. On another front of the legal battle Apple is being accused by Motorola in front of the US International Trade Commission of infringing seven of its now Google-owned patents. Motorola is willing to settle "these patent matters, but Apple’s unwillingness to work out a license leaves us little choice but ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Nobody knows exactly when the Apple vs. Samsung courtroom drama will ever stop (if) and what will the outcome be. According to some court documents the Cupertino-based company has asked Samsung, back in October of 2010, for royalty fees also saying they "would have preferred that Samsung request a license in advance". A total amount of $30 was requested for any touch-screen-enabled phone, let it be Windows Phone, Android of another platform (Bada, Symbian, etc.) and $40 for each tablet -- amount which would decrease to $30 over two years. There were also some discounts planned: phones ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    After ruling that Samsung's tablet was not as cool as the iPad, the U.K. court considered that a proper way to compensate the South Korean manufacturer was, among others things, for Apple to post a message which publicly clears Samsung of any accusations that it copied the iPad’s design. The fruit-company has managed to score a stay in the case, at least until October, when Apple can be heard in front of the court. Those of you who hoped to see a huge "Samsung did not copy us" message while going to Apple's website will have to wait a little bit more, at least until the beginning of Q4. ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Here's an interesting twist in the Apple vs. Samsung lawsuit: the Cupertino-based company is preparing to use the Korean manufacturer's own words against it. According to an un-redacted Apple trial brief, Samsung not only had knowledge of what it was doing (in this case, copying Apple products) but it also deliberately did that, despite being advised by third parties (among which Google and designers) to not do so. The Apple brief states that "Samsung’s documents show the similarity of Samsung’s products is no accident or, as Samsung would have it, a ‘natural evolution' [...] Rather, ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    After successfully obtaining an injunction in the U.S. against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, Apple managed to achieve the same for the Google Samsung Galaxy Nexus. Samsung, as expected, appealed the Galaxy Tab 10.1 ruling and is now doing the same in case of the latest Google phone. A motion to stay the injunction was filed for the entire duration of the appeal; it includes seven points, among which, Samsung's assessment that "The Court's finding that Apple will suffer irreparable harm was based on legally insufficient evidence that Samsung and Apple are competitors", and "'People' and ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Yesterday, Apple has been granted an injunction against Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the U.S., granted, that Cupertino has to post a $2.6 million bond protecting Samsung from losses in case the ruling turns out to be wrong; only then will the injection become effective. Make no mistake, Apple already posted the bond like a champ, according to reports. Samsung, on its end, filed a motion to stay the injunction pending its appeal with the Federal Circuit and asked for an expedited hearing by Friday. Apple, according to reports, agreed to the expedite request, but asked for Monday as a ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Apple filed a motion for preliminary injunction against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the U.S. on May 19, having Cupertino's design patent at its core. Fast forward to the present and Apple managed to successfully block the sales of the Samsung tablet in the U.S., just a couple of hours before Google I/O kicks off. Well known by now U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has initially denied Apple's motion but an appeal's court considered it was time to review the order. The Judge said that "although Samsung has a right to compete, it does not have a right to compete unfairly, by flooding the ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero was appointed to oversee settlement talks between Apple and Samsung -- ordered by Judge Lucy Koh from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the course of two days on Monday and Tuesday, May 21 and 22. This might come as no surprise to you but the two giants have not reached an agreement, according to reports. Samsung's CEO Choi Gee-sung and Head of the firm’s Mobile Division, Shin Jong-kyun, were present at the meeting on behalf of the South Korean manufacturer and Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, represented the ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    This is probably not the best way to sit down at the table, start negotiations, and try to settle -- as the court ordered Apple and Samsung for May 21 and 22; the Cupertino company has filed for an immediate U.S. preliminary injunction against Samsung and its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet, having a court order at its base recognizing Apple's design patent (in appeal). Samsung had to slightly redesign the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Germany -- because of Apple's design patent infringement claim -- where you can find the Galaxy Tab 10.1N (with the speakers being placed on the bezel to the left and right of ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    The HTC EVO 4G LTE should have been on shelves today, May 18, but thanks to an ITC ruling banning imports of HTC devices as of April 19 there are some delays thanks to U.S. Customs who are taking their job (and the ruling) seriously (as one would expect). There was a ray of light however which might have gotten your hopes up yesterday: Best Buy sent out a letter letting people know that the HTC EVO 4G LTE should be available as of May 23. Today Best Buy is taking your hopes and scatters them away. According to a new letter being sent out, the previous one contained incorrect information ...

    Share
    Read On
  • by |

    Just like there's a lot of suing going on lately, there's also a lot of settling (mediation) as a result of court orders (which is probably the wisest choice in many cases). Apple and Samsung have been ordered to settle their differences (patents) over two days next week on May 21 and 22 and now Apple has been ordered to attend a settlement meeting with HTC. The Delaware court ordered the two companies to meet up in Delaware on August 28, 2012 in order to discuss the possibility of a settlement. Just as in the Samsung case, there will be a third (non-involved) party mediating and ...

    Share
    Read On
Mobile Version