Google puts out bounty on finding Android bugs

Advertisement

When a developer is writing code, the presumption is that he or she is attempting to do so while avoiding the creation of unwanted security vulnerabilities. And then we have review and testing to help catch any holes that may have slipped through. Still, it’s not a perfect process, and some of those vulnerabilities make their way to released software. Eventually, the bugs might be spotted, either by white hats looking to keep things secure, or hackers looking for something new to exploit. Google isn’t content to just sit back and let all that happen on its own, and has been getting proactive about identifying problem code through its Patch Rewards program. This week, we learn of the program’s expansion to now cover the Android Open Source Project.

Devs who identify and deliver patches to enhance Android security can apply for rewards ranging from $500 to $3,133.70 (cheeky), based on Google’s opinion of just how large an impact that patch makes. We’re not even talking about identifying specifically exploitable bugs – even more general improvements to firm-up security are eligible.

Sure, malware will continue to exist, but efforts like this seek to minimize its impact and keep it from interfering with our day-to-day lives.

Source: Google
Via: GigaOM

Advertisement

What's your reaction?
Love It
0%
Like It
0%
Want It
0%
Had It
0%
Hated It
0%
About The Author
Stephen Schenck
Stephen has been writing about electronics since 2008, which only serves to frustrate him that he waited so long to combine his love of gadgets and his degree in writing. In his spare time, he collects console and arcade game hardware, is a motorcycle enthusiast, and enjoys trapping blue crabs. Stephen's first mobile device was a 624 MHz Dell Axim X30, which he's convinced is still a viable platform. Stephen longs for a market where phones are sold independently of service, and bandwidth is cheap and plentiful; he's not holding his breath. In the meantime, he devours smartphone news and tries to sort out the juicy bitsRead more about Stephen Schenck!