Apple Explains Missing iPod Touch Light Sensor

Advertisement

Yesterday we talked a little about the hardware inside the new iPod touch, and how Apple had elected to construct the handset without an ambient light sensor, as had been present in previous generations of the model. Based on your comments, a lot of you sounded quite upset that Apple would remove such a cheap, useful component from the device. What could it have been thinking? Well, today we get to see a response Apple Senior VP Phil Schiller apparently sent to one user, giving him an explanation for the missing sensor.

The way Schiller tells it, the current-gen iPod touch lacks an ambient light sensor because the model is simply too thin to accommodate one.

Now sure, the iPod touch is a fantastically thin 6.1 millimeters, but there was still plenty of room for a main camera, a front-facer, and a flash; surely there must have been somewhere to squeeze-in a photodiode. After all, they’re not exactly bulky components, and even if it came down to making the iPod touch 6.2 millimeters thick, instead, would users even care?

Assuming we buy Apple’s explanation, do you think it made a bad call here? Are you willing to start sacrificing features for thin devices?

Source: Apple
Via: 9to5 Mac

Advertisement

What's your reaction?
Love It
0%
Like It
0%
Want It
0%
Had It
0%
Hated It
0%
About The Author
Stephen Schenck
Stephen has been writing about electronics since 2008, which only serves to frustrate him that he waited so long to combine his love of gadgets and his degree in writing. In his spare time, he collects console and arcade game hardware, is a motorcycle enthusiast, and enjoys trapping blue crabs. Stephen's first mobile device was a 624 MHz Dell Axim X30, which he's convinced is still a viable platform. Stephen longs for a market where phones are sold independently of service, and bandwidth is cheap and plentiful; he's not holding his breath. In the meantime, he devours smartphone news and tries to sort out the juicy bitsRead more about Stephen Schenck!